Skip to content

WIP: Remove bazel#916

Open
justinsb wants to merge 2 commits intokubernetes:masterfrom
justinsb:bazel_is_no_longer_tested
Open

WIP: Remove bazel#916
justinsb wants to merge 2 commits intokubernetes:masterfrom
justinsb:bazel_is_no_longer_tested

Conversation

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

@justinsb justinsb commented Nov 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

For discussion; we don't think bazel is our tested build process, so we should probably remove it in favor of the build process we test.

Looks like there might be some deeper dependencies in e.g. cloudbuild.yaml

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 6, 2025

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If the repository mantainers determine this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. labels Nov 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 6, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mmamczur for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from aojea and cici37 November 6, 2025 13:47
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 6, 2025

@justinsb: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
cloud-provider-gcp-tests 0362021 link true /test cloud-provider-gcp-tests
cloud-provider-gcp-verify-up-to-date 0362021 link true /test cloud-provider-gcp-verify-up-to-date
cloud-provider-gcp-e2e-full 0362021 link true /test cloud-provider-gcp-e2e-full
cloud-provider-gcp-verify-all 0362021 link true /test cloud-provider-gcp-verify-all

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@justinsb justinsb mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2025
Merged
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

justinsb commented Nov 6, 2025

Working on pulling the test logic out of prow config into our repo in #917, so we can then remove bazel in a single PR

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 14, 2025

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@upodroid upodroid mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2025
Closed
@elmiko elmiko mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2025
Open
@hdp617
Copy link
Contributor

hdp617 commented Jan 21, 2026

@justinsb Are you still working on this PR? If not, @LogicalShark also started looking into removing Bazel and I think we can close this PR.

cc @YifeiZhuang @bowei

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@aojea aojea Awaiting requested review from aojea

@cici37 cici37 Awaiting requested review from cici37

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@justinsb @k8s-ci-robot @hdp617